Food, Cancer and Well-Being: BBC R4 Food programme, 19th May

Sheila Dillon asks if food and nutrition should have a bigger role in treating cancer. Is the medical profession too reluctant to see food as an essential component in improving the well-being of cancer patients.

Previewing the programme on Friday 17th May 2013 [listen at  http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01sdw1p, 22 minutes 35s in, or a short clip at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0195c67], Sheila Dillon, the show's presenter, herself diagnosed with bone marrow cancer, spoke on BBC R4's Women's Hour about the lack of nutritional knowledge among doctors. Doctors trained at Edinburgh University Medical School declared that nutrition formed no part of the syllabus, and that there is a lack of human based empirical evidence for the effect of diet or supplements in the treatment of cancer. In a busy clinic it's just not the doctors' priority to talk about diet when they would much rather talk about the anti-cancer treatments where there is a huge amount of evidence of it working in almost all patients.  Read More...

Articles - Latest

Darwin’s original thesis, trashed by Weismann, restored by David Marsh.

Michael Crawford says: In an excellent meeting on 22nd November 2011, David Marsh, winner of the Cleave Cup for 2011, expounded on "The Origins of Diversity":

In all 6 editions of the "Origin of Species", Darwin claims that there were two forces in evolution – natural selection and conditions of existence. Of the two he says the conditions of existence was the most powerful. After finishing the 6th edition, he spent the rest of his life looking for what he called pangenes – these he considered were the tools in the blood whereby information from the environment was sent to the genes to respond to the environmental conditions.
 
Weismann did not like this as he considered it to be too Lamarckian, so he cut off tails of unfortunate mice for several generations and as they still produced tails he declared the conditions of existence was disproved and wrote a paper call the “All Sufficiency of Natural Selection” . This was the birth of Neo-Darwinism which has been the name of the game since. Sadly he should have known better. What he was testing was the power of mutilation, not condition of existence which Weston-Price and Sir Robert McCarrison both identified in the impact of nutrition on health. After all the Hebrews had been cutting off foreskins for 3,000 years and he should have known that their male children were still born with foreskins!!